Friday, July 6, 2012

Kalpana Kannabiran on M.S.S.Pandian's note on NCERT text books

Here is a letter I wrote to the Editor, The Hindu, which was not carried. Also relevant is the fact that Pandian's note is an independent report and not part of the deliberations of the Review Committee. The official report very clearly states that Pandian did not attend the meetings and did not participate in the discussions.  He was therefore only a nominal member of the committee.  His note does not form part of the report of the review committee. His note in this context can scarcely be described as a "dissent", which must by definition arise from the deliberations and must form part of the report.

I think this is necessary for us to bear in mind.


Dear Editor

There are widely varying views on the use of cartoons in NCERT textbooks. MSS Pandian's dissent (4 July)  is completely in line with one set of views that unequivocally defends the textbooks.  The trouble with this view is that it dismisses criticism without applying the critical thinking that  it advocates for children to its own endeavours. Pandian does not say anything new or different either in tenor or substance.  Nor does his note on the face of it engage with the deliberations of the Thorat  Committee. Be that as it may, what is surprising is the tenor of the editorial, which reiterates what Pandian has said, and casts all criticism of the textbooks in the language of honour and shame. Why is it a national shame if the government accepts the recommendations of the Thorat Committee and why is Pandian's dissent honourable? After due deliberation, the committee has arrived at a set of recommendations, which one can agree or disagree with. But surely The Hindu should make space for more representative stands on the issue.

Kalpana Kannabiran
Council for Social Development
Hyderabad 500030

1 comment:

  1. Just because one expresses a dissenting note, it cannot be construed profane. After reading Prof. Pandian's dissenting note on the Thorat's Committee recommendation of being a moral police, it is indeed visionary and any enlightened person will only honour Prof. Pandian's view and not the idiotic Thorat committees' backward looking idealogies which thwarts constructive ideas in young minds.