Showing posts with label cartoon controversy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cartoon controversy. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

How the S.K.Thorat committee reviewed the cartoons?



( this is the portion where the committee explained its approach. It is shocking to know that there were no guidelines to choose cartoons for the text books. It was left to the text book development team. The report is yet to be released officially. This is from the ‘ wiki leaked’ report published by Kafila)
Guidelines used by the Committee to review the Materials and Visuals

The Review Committee reviewed the six textbooks keeping in view the above mentioned guidelines and principles, namely guiding principles of National Curriculum Framework – 2005, objective of Teaching of Social Sciences at Secondary and Higher Secondary Stage and Specific objectives of teaching political science at Secondary and Sr. Secondary stage.  Further the following criteria were also taken into consideration while reviewing the educational materials, consisting of both written text and visual including the cartoons. 
5.1     Criteria to Review the Content of Textbooks
     i.        Convergence:
While reviewing the textbooks the Committee examined whether the written text or contents were in consonance with the illustrations.

   ii.        Targeting of individuals or groups of individual 
The lessons were reviewed to see whether the content both verbal and non verbal and examples, targets individuals or group of individuals or are intended to clarify the concepts and content.  Whether there were distortions in explanation and interpretation?  Whether the illustrations or pictures were “event specific or person specific.” 
 iii.        Sense of proportion in presentation
Balance in content, illustrations, visuals, cartoons and other visuals.

 iv.        Analytical and synthesis mode
Whether the content of the lessons focuses only on analysis or on synthesis also.

   v.        Level of satire 
What is the level of satire? Is it appropriate for students of that age? Is the satire subtle or abrasive?
 vi.        Positive and negative examples
Is there a balance between positive and negative examples – case studies, cartoons, visuals, collage etc?
7.                   Quality of illustration
Quality of the illustration was seen in terms of being eye-catching and stimulating the imagination

8.   Sensitivity 
a)    How sensitive are the cartoons and illustrations towards communities, castes, ethnicity, religions, women, language and other groups and minorities? In a country as diverse as India the above considerations cannot be disregarded.
b)   Individual specific and issue specific visuals

5.2     Guidelines used for review of cartoons
The general objection raised in Parliament and outside Parliament by some groups was that the use of cartoons is inappropriate in some textbooks.  The letter by two Advisors to the Review Committee also mentions this.  The Committee tried to get the guidelines for the use of cartoons by NCERT.  It emerged from the discussion with the former Director of NCERT and Chief Advisors that no specific guidelines were laid down for the use of visuals including cartoons.  The general guidelines used for the written text were also used for selection of cartoons.  The Chief Advisors in the interactive meeting held on 28 May 2012 informed the Committee that the selection of the cartoons was generally left to the Textbook Development Team.
However the Chief Advisors in ‘A Letter to You’ in the books mentioned the importance of the cartoons in teaching.   In the text book titled Indian Constitution at work for Class XI, importance of cartoons has been pointed out.  The Advisors write that “the cartoons are not there simply as comic relief. They tell about the criticisms, the weak spots and mere failures.  They also help to learn both about politics and about how to think about politics.  “Thus for these reasons, the Advisors emphasised the importance of cartoons in teaching.  Chief Advisors observed:
We cannot claim to be experts in educational psychology and it may be important to take experts’ view on whether or not students aged 15-18 should be exposed to cartoons. We simply shared and followed the spirit of NCF 2005 that invited us to bridge the gap between bookish leaning and the world outside the classrooms. Cartoons used in the Political Science textbooks do different things at different points in the text: entertain or engaged the readers, invite them to return to the text with a new range of questions or help them achieve   critical distance vis-a-vis received wisdom, including that of the textbook itself.—-Exposing the students to these and other cartoons from all over the world encourage them to relates to the working of democracy. Elements such as cartoons, pictures and news papers clipping aim at situating the abstract point in the context of the actual processes that unfolded in the past or are unfolding in the contemporary  movement. These are not visual distractions but integral to the design of these textbooks.”
The former Director of NCERT and the Chief Advisors thus attributed great significance to the use of cartoons in teaching.  This view indeed is supported by researchers as well.  It is argued that sociologically, cartoons are a powerful means of providing social and political comments because so often they are unmasking and they reveal the contrast between perception and reality.  Cartoons can be used with students to objectively analyse every day social behaviour and stimulus to reflections on attitudes. (Ziegler 1998, Witkin 1999, Khauan Wai Bing and Chua Hong Tam 2003, Taher Bahrani Rahmatollah Soltani, 2011) (see reference at the end).
However the views expressed by the Advisors did not mention about the precautions in the selection and use of the cartoons in teaching.  The literature on the use of the cartoons revealed that while it recognised their usefulness in teaching, it also demand precaution in their use.  There is a need for a careful balance with humour and the content that we would like our student to learn.” (Khauan Wai     Bing and Chua Hong Tam 2003, Taher Bahrani Rahmatollah Soltani, 2011).  The researchers have indicated precaution in few respects.  The first precaution is about the careful selection of the cartoons keeping in view the goals of the specific subject. It is through the careful selection and use of appropriate and relevant cartoons that an element of humour can be introduced, where appropriate, without detracting from the intension of the teaching.  The second precaution is that it is essential to practice using it at least once with groups of learners before final inclusion in the textbook.  According to experts, this will help to find out if the cartoon selected is going to work and in the expected way with expected results. If they do not produce the desire effects, then it might need to be scrapped or modified (Taher Bahrani Rahmatollah Soltani, 2011).  The researchers also warn that, users has to guard against the overuse of cartoons or possible “unintended consequences”, particularly of caption humour, which are sensitive to certain groups  of people in  culturally diversified society.  The expert further cautioned that there is also the risk of offending through misunderstanding with any joke being perceived as source of ridicule, sarcasm or as being racist or sexist in nature (Khauan Wai     Bing and Chua Hong Tam 2003) . There is also likely to be differential response between the students due their background and language deficiency .It is for these risk elements that cartoons need to be used wisely. Wai and Tam argued that facilitators have to realize that what works for some people might not work for others. The researchers also caution about the overuse of cartoons and mentioned that ,” one has to be careful not to overuse cartoons or their effect will be diminished if not lost” .There is a  needs to be a careful balance with humour and the content that we would like our students  to learn, observed  Wai and Tam ( 2003) .
In the absence of clear guidelines for the use of cartoons by NCERT, the review Committee has kept these insights in consideration in reviewing the cartoons in six textbooks in Political Science. The Committee used the following criterion to review the cartoons:
·         ·         Based on visual relief and fun
·         ·         Improve teaching and learning
·         ·         Provides background information in the text  to help the students appreciate the message
·         ·         Help expand students’ imagination
·         ·         Sensitivity with respect to various caste, ethnic, religious, gender  and regional minorities
·         ·         Messages the cartoons give about the people and political Institutions.


Monday, July 2, 2012

S.K.Thorat Committee says ‘NO’ to the word Dalit in the NCERT text books.





The report of the S.K.Thorat committee appointed to review NCERT text books has recommended not using the word Dalit in the text books. When it gives its general recommendations it has mentioned that The word Dalit should not be used.  In that place SC should be used or it should be verified whether the replacement is legally fine” (APPENDIX 1 Class IX      Democratic Politics) . I do not see any valid reason in this recommendation.
I am giving below an exchange occurred between me and Mr K.Narayanan, the former Readers’ Editor of The Hindu Newspaper, in 2008.








1.

06.09.2008

Dear Mr. Ravikumar,

I would like to have your comments on this.

Thank you.

K. Narayanan
The Readers' Editor,
The Hindu,
Kasturi Buildings,
859 -- 860 Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002
India

Ph: +91-44-28418297 (11 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday to Friday)
Fax: +91-44-28552963

-----Forwarded by Readers Editor/CHEN-THED/ksl on 06/09/2008 03:59PM -----

From: "hemant kumar" <hemantkumar_mallb@rediffmail.com>
Date: 05/13/2008 12:04PM
Subject: FOR KIND ATTENTION OF HON'BLE READERS EDITOR PLEASE


  
RESPECTED R/EDITOR SIR, 
                      WITH DUE RESPECT AND REGARD, IT IS HUMBLY BROUGHT TO YOUR KIND NOTICE THAT MANY A TIMES YOUR ESTEEMED NEWSPAPER CARRIES NEWS REPORTS ABOUT DALIT ATROCITIES AND OTHER INCIDENTS REGARDING  THEM. ALTHOUGH IT WAS INSTRUCTED BY THE NATIONAL COMMISSION  OF SCHEDULED CASTED WAY BACK IN JANUARY 2008 THAT THE WORD "DALIT" SHOULD NOT BE USED AS IT IS NEITHER CONSTITUTIONAL NOR IT FINDS MENTION IN ANY STATUTE.  AFTER THIS DIRECTIVE, VARIOUS STATE GOVERNMENTS INCLUDING HARYANA AS WELL AS UT ADMN INSTRUCTED AGAINST USE OF THE WORK DALIT IN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS ETC.  
                    THE QUESTION I WANT TO ASK IS WHETHER THE PRESS SHOULD CONTINUE USING THE WORK "DALIT".  I THINK THE PRESS COUNCIL SHOULD HAVE A THOROUGH DEBATE OVER THIS.  I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR YOUR REPUTED PAPER'S VIEW ON THE SUBJECT. 

                      WITH REGARDS, 



HEMANT KUMAR 
ADVOCATE 
# 414  SECTOR 7 
URBAN ESTATE 
AMBALA CITY 
HARYANA 
CELL 09416193454 

===================

2.

16.06.2008


Dear Shri Narayanan

Sorry for the inordinate delay.Please see below my response
Ravikumar




'Dalit' and SC commission 

-Ravikumar*

           It is true that the National SC/ST commission has suggested that the word  Dalit not be used in official communication and a few state governments have acted on this. The commission's view is that the term is 'unconstitutional'. What we must realize is that the Constitution is not a lexicon. It cannot delimit social and cultural usage. In the US, the term negro was used for a long time to refer to blacks. Today, African American is used by every one. In India, the bureaucracy and administration have to keep pace with the times. The use of the official term Scheduled Castes does not in any way clash with the social/ academic/ literary/ media use of the term Dalit. The two are independent. Some observations in this context.

1.    Statutes are enacted to maintain law and order not to interfere in the affairs of language. So looking at the statutes to decide the fate of a word is incorrect.
2.    The SC/ST commission's directive is only meant for 'the official documents' not for the media or literature or rest of society.
3.    Dalit leaders have used many words to call themselves. Pandit  Iyothee Thass(1845-1914) a leader of Tamil dalits had used "casteless Dravidians" and "Original Buddhists". He criticized the usage of the word 'Depressed Class' in his writings.
4.    Ambedkar used several words -- Depressed Class, Untouchables and Minorities, and also on a few occasions the term 'Dalit'.
5.    A well known scholar of the Dalit movement and literature Eleanor Zelliot has stated in her introduction to Vasant Moon's autobiography 'Growing up Untouchable in India': "The most recent nomenclature for ex-untouchables is 'dalit'; a term meaning downtrodden or broken down but used with pride as self-chosen name that reflects no idea of pollution and can include all who identify themselves as oppressed by the caste system.' Dalit' came into currency in the 1970s in movements that took names such as Dalit Panthers and Dalit literature and now is the preferred name for those (such as Vasant Moon) who want to free themselves from the concept of pollution and from the patronage of Gandhian ideology". So the etymological meaning of the word 'Dalit' is not important here as much as its functional meaning.
6.    It is a 'subjectivity' chosen by those who want to annihilate caste system; it is not an 'identity'. Choosing subjectivity is a conscious act. But the Hindu caste system wants to reduce the subjectivity into an identity by making the word as a mere replacement for Scheduled Caste or Untouchable.
7.    So we have to restrict the instruction of the SC commission to official documents of the central/state governments.
8.    We must oppose any attempt to ban the word 'Dalit'.
9.    At a time when the Australian prime minister apologized to the nation for the atrocities perpetrated on the aborigines, and at a time when in Canada the state has apologized for the oppressive policies Native Americans (First Nation people) were subjected to till as late as the 1970s, we in India seem to be involved to be quibbling over non-substantive issues.

         *Ravikumar is the author of ‘Venomous Touch- Notes on Caste,Culture and Politics ( Samya, 2009)I General Secretary of Viduthalai Ciruthaikal Katchi(VCK) and former MLA of  Tamilnadu .

Friday, June 29, 2012

Overuse of political cartoons in school textbooks: Thorat Committee

NEW DELHI: The Thorat Committee constituted to review NCERT's political science textbooks is of the view that there has been an overuse of political cartoons. It has recommended that guidelines be put in place to govern the use of materials like cartoon.

In the aftermath of the controversy over the Ambedkar cartoon during the Budget session of Parliament, the human resource development ministry had asked the NCERT to set up a committee to review the social science and political science textbooks published by the NCERT for classes IX to XII. The Committee headed by SK Thorat, chairman of the Indian Council of Social Science Research set up on May 14 was review these textbooks with an eye to identify educationally inappropriate material in them and to provide suggestions for alternatives to be placed in the textbooks.

The Committee had one month to review the Class XI political science textbook, "Indian Constitution at Work". The use of a 1949 cartoon by Shankar in the NCERT textbook had created a stir in Parliament, as many MPs found its depiction of Ambedkar unacceptable.

In its review of the Class XII text, the Committee felt that there had been an overuse of cartoons and some of these were not relevant. Sources close to the developments said that "students in big metros like Delhi and Bombay can understand these cartoons in the spirit in which they were made. This is because they are exposed to and have access to a lot of other materials and information. However, students in smaller towns and rural areas don't have that same access, and the cartoons take on a different interpretation."

There was a view in the Committee that some of the cartoons were not very innocent and therefore liable to hurt sentiments. Given that it was very difficult to determine which cartoons could hurt the sentiments of groups of people or communities, the Committee felt that there was a need to establish guidelines for the use of materials like cartoons. This would allow for a more judicious choice. Sources stressed that the Committee was happy with the approach taken in these textbooks, and would not like them withdrawn.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

சர்சைக்குள்ளான மற்றுமொரு கேலிச்சித்திரம்


சர்சைக்குள்ளான மற்றுமொரு கேலிச்சித்திரம்

கடைசியாக பிரசுரிக்கப்பட்டது: 8 ஜூன், 2012 - 16:17 ஜிஎம்டி
சர்ச்சைக்குள்ளான கேலிச்சித்திரம்
சர்ச்சைக்குள்ளான கேலிச்சித்திரம்
இந்தியாவின் மத்திய அரசின் தேசிய கல்வி ஆராய்ச்சி மற்றும் பயிற்சி கவுன்சில் தயாரித்து வெளியிட்டுள்ள பாடப்புத்தகம் ஒன்றில் அம்பேத்கார் குறித்த கார்ட்டூன் ஒன்று மறு பிரசுரம் செய்யப்பட்டிருந்தமை சமீபத்தில் பெரும் சர்ச்சையை ஏற்படுத்தியது.
இப்போது, அதே அமைப்பு தயாரித்து வெளியிட்டிருக்கும் அந்தப்புத்தகத்தில், தமிழகத்தில் நடந்த இந்தி எதிர்ப்புப் போராட்டம் குறித்து அக்காலகட்டத்தில் ஆங்கிலப் பத்திரிகை ஒன்றில் வெளியான கேலிச்சித்திரம் ஒன்று போடப்பட்டிருப்பது மீண்டும் சர்ச்சையை தூண்டியிருக்கிறது.

முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் துரைமுருகனின் செவ்வி

இந்த கேலிச்சித்திரத்தில், இந்தி எதிர்ப்புப் போராட்டத்தில் மாணவர்கள் பலர் ஈடுபட்டிருக்கையில், இந்தித் திணிப்பு இல்லை, ஆங்கிலக் கல்வி தொடரும் என்று கூறும் ஆங்கிலப் பதாகைகளை ராஜாஜி தாங்கிக்கொண்டிருப்பது போலவும், அதைப் பார்க்கும் வேறு சிலர், இந்த இந்தி எதிர்ப்புப் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டிருக்கும் மாணவர்களுக்கு ஆங்கிலமும் தெரியாது என்று கூறுவது போலவும் கூறப்பட்டிருக்கிறது.
இந்தக் கேலிச்சித்திரம், இந்தி எதிர்ப்புப் போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்ட மாணவர்களை இழிவு படுத்துவதாகவும், அந்தக் கேலிச்சித்திரத்துடன், திராவிட இயக்கம் குறித்து எழுதப்பட்டிருக்கும் கட்டுரை, திராவிட இயக்கம் குறித்த ஒரு மேம்போக்கான கருத்தை வெளியிடுவதாகவும் , இதை முதலில் தனது இணைய தளத்தில் பிரசுரித்த விடுதலைச் சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சியின் முன்னாள் சட்டமன்ற உறுப்பினர் ரவிக்குமார் கூறுகிறார்.
இந்த கேலிச்சித்திரம் குறித்து தமிழக முன்னாள் அமைச்சரும் இந்தி எதிர்ப்பு போராட்டத்தில் ஈடுபட்டவருமான துரைமுருகன் அவர்கள் கண்டனம் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.
அத்துடன் இந்த கேலிச்சித்திரம் பற்றி, 1960களில் இந்தி எதிர்ப்புப் போராட்டத்தை முன்னின்று நடத்திய திமுகவின் நிலைப்பாடு என்ன என்பது குறித்து, துரைமுருகன் அவர்களின் கருத்தை நேயர்கள் இங்கு கேட்கலாம்.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/tamil/

Thursday, May 17, 2012

என்.சி.இ.ஆர்.டி புத்தகம் இஸ்லாமியர்களைப் புண்படுத்தும் கார்ட்டூனைக்கொண்டிருக்கவில்லையா?




தற்போது சர்ச்சைக்கு உள்ளாகியிருக்கும் அரசியலமைப்புச் சட்டம் குறித்த என் சி இ ஆர் டி புத்தகத்தின் முதல் அத்தியாயத்தில் அம்பேத்கர் கார்ட்டூன் மட்டுமின்றி வேறு பல கார்ட்டூன்களும் கொடுக்கப்பட்டிருக்கின்றன. ஐரோப்பிய யூனியன் மற்றும் ஈராக் ஆகியவற்றின் அரசியலமைப்புச் சட்டத்தை உருவாக்குவதில் ஏற்பட்ட கருத்து வேற்றுமைகள் இரு வேறு கார்ட்டூன்கள் மூலம் விளக்கப்பட்டிருக்கின்றன. அவற்றை இங்கே தந்திருக்கிறேன். ஐரோப்பிய யூனியன் நாடுகளைச் சேர்ந்த தலைவர்கள் தமது கருத்து வேறுபாடுகளை மறைத்துக்கொண்டு மிகவும் நாசூக்காக போஸ் கொடுப்பதுபோல ஒரு கார்ட்டூனில் உள்ளது.ஆனால் ஈராக்கிலோ முஸ்லீம்களின் பல்வேறு பிரிவினர் மிகவும் மூர்க்கமாகத் தமக்குள் சண்டையிட்டுக்கொள்வதாக ஒரு கார்ட்டூன் சித்திரிக்கிறது.



சர்வதேச சட்டங்கள் அனைத்துக்கும் மாறாக ஈராக்கை ஆக்கிரமித்து சதாம் உசைனைப் படுகொலை செய்துவிட்டு அங்கே அரசியல் குழப்பத்தை ஏற்படுத்திய அமெரிக்காவைச் சேர்ந்த கார்ட்டூனிஸ்ட் ஜான் ட்ரெவெரின் கார்ட்டூனை இங்கே எதற்காகப் பயன்படுத்தவேண்டும்? இந்த கார்ட்டூனுக்குக் கீழே எழுதப்பட்டிருக்கும் வாசகத்தில் ‘இந்த கார்ட்டூனில் சித்திரிக்கப்பட்டிருக்கும் மோதலை ஐரோப்பிய யூனியன் மற்றும் இந்தியா குறித்த கார்ட்டூன்களோடு ஒப்பிட்டுப் பார்க்கவும்’ எனக் குறிப்பிடப்பட்டிருக்கிறது. அப்படி ஒப்பிடுகிற ஒரு மாணவர் என்ன முடிவுக்கு வருவார்? இஸ்லாமியர்கள் நாகரீகமற்றவர்கள் என்றுதானே எண்ணுவார்? இந்தப் பாடத்தை எழுதிய குழுவில் ஒரு முஸ்லீம் இடம்பெற்றிருந்தால் இந்தக் கார்ட்டூனை அவர் அனுமதித்திருப்பாரா?

சுதந்திரம் குறித்து முழங்குகிற ‘ கல்வியாளர்கள்’ இதைப் பற்றி என்ன சொல்கிறார்கள்?