Monday, July 23, 2012
Resisting Caste Violence - NTUI on Maruti-Suzuki
Sunday, July 22, 2012
மணற்கேணி மூன்றாம் ஆண்டின் முதல் இதழ்
வணக்கம்
மணற்கேணி மூன்றாம் ஆண்டின் முதல் இதழ் தமிழ்ச் செவ்வியல் ஆய்வுகள் குறித்த சிறப்பிதழாக வெளியாகிறது.
சிறப்புப் பகுதியில் கி.நாச்சிமுத்து,கோ.விசயவேணுகோ
ஷார்ல் போதலேரின் கவிதைகள்
பாகிஸ்தான் எழுத்தாளர் சபின் சாவேரி ஜிலானி , தேன்மொழி, ரவிக்குமார், ஆகியோரின் சிறுகதைகள்
பூலாங்குறிச்சி கல்வெட்டுகள் குறித்து விசயவேணுகோபால், எடக்கல் , சமணர் மலை கல்வெட்டுகள் குறித்து ராசவேலு கட்டுரைகள்
சங்க காலத்தில் கல்வி குறித்த க.ப.அறவாணனின் கட்டுரை
இ.அண்ணாமலை அவர்களின் நேர்காணல்
புகழ்பெற்ற பெண்ணியக் கோட்பாட்டாளர் லூஸி இரிகாரே வின் ' நமது உதடுகள் ஒன்றாகப் பேசும்போது ' என்ற கட்டுரை
ஈழம் தொடர்பான இரண்டு நூல்கள் குறித்து எம்.எஸ்.எஸ் .பாண்டியன் , துவாரகன் ஆகியோரின் கட்டுரைகள்
120 பக்கங்கள் விலை 60 ரூபாய் .
பிரதி வேண்டுவோர் manarkeni@gmail.com என்ற மின்னஞ்சல் முகவரிக்கு எழுதுங்கள்.
Friday, July 20, 2012
'தமிழும் சமஸ்கிருதமும் ' ஆய்வரங்கு
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Does any political party really cares for Lankan Tamils?
- Article
- Comments (0)
Does any political party really cares for Lankan Tamils?
Three years have passed since the LTTE's armed movement was crushed by Sri Lanka security forces, yet there seems less efforts on the part of Lankan government to rehabilitate the Lankan Tamils.
The major political parties in Tamil Nadu that have always raised a hue and cry over the conditions of Lankan Tamils do seem to be caring less about the plight of the community. The stand taken by these parties shows whether these parties really care about the plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka?.
''The past contribution of DMK and AIADMK till M G Ramachandran was alive, was really commendable in the struggle for the rights of the Sri Lanka Tamils," says Pamaran, a Coimbatore based writer and political analyst.
DMK patriarch M.Karunanidhi, the favorite whipping boy of LTTE sympathizers and Tamil Eelam supporters in Tamil Nadu, has recently made the most experienced circus artists shy by his flip flop on the Eelam issue. Few months ago he had said that he was even ready to die for Tamil Eelam, a demand for separate country for Sri Lanka Tamils. He also revived the Tamil Eelam Supporters Organisation (TESO) which he formed in 1985 and dismantled after few years later.
Karunanidhi roped in Dravidar Kazhagam and Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi as part of the TESO. He called for UN sponsored referendum among Sri Lanka Tamils to form a separate country for them. But he seems to have lost his 'leader of Tamil race' tag due to his inability to prevent or make a sincere effort to stop the reported massacre of 40,000 Tamils during the end of fourth Eelam war in 2009. His attempt to revive TESO is being seen as another political stunt.
Karunanidhi himself has proved that it was a 'stunt' when he said last Monday that he will not pass a resolution in the TESO conference that is scheduled to be held in Chennai on August 12. "There shall be no call for UN sponsored referendum also. The meet will only focus on the plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka and stopping the sinhalisation of Tamil lands," said a DMK leader.
Well, this is the practical thing that DMK can now do. The reason for the sudden somersault in the stand of the grand old Dravidian party is due to the meeting between Karunanidhi and Home Minister P.Chidambaram. Home Minister expressed the Union government's reservation over the separate Eelam call of the TESO.
New Delhi feels that a separate country call for Tamils may spell doom for Indian unity as the sections of Tamils in Tamil Nadu too will aspire for a separate nation as it was an age old call of the Dravidian movement though they dropped it back in the sixties and had integrated into the mainstream. The recent communique from the Union Home ministry extending the ban on LTTE in the India clearly shows that LTTE may have the potential to create trouble in the country.
KS Radhakrishan, senior DMK leader who is working to organise the TESO conference, says that the DMK's goal is to make the Tamils in Sri Lanka live peacefully and fearlessly. ''It is the immediate goal. We did not receive any pressure from the Centre to drop the Tamil Eelam agenda," he added.
Now every political party in the state except Congress has asked the Center to sent back the Sri Lankan army officers who were being trained in army camps in India. Parties which are more vocal in raising Sri Lankan issues like Vaiko led MDMK are conducting agitations in front of the military establishments in Chennai and Wellingdon.
''Smaller parties like us could not do anything substantial. In the sixties revolutionary movements in African and Latin American countries got support of the revolutionary organizations of the other countries. But it is history now. Post 9/11, only states can intervene in situations like Sri Lanka. In this case clearly India can only intervene to bring peace or political solution in that country because of its proximity," says former MLA D Ravikumar from Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Party which is one of the most vocal pro-Tamil political parties in the state.
He also adds: ''The Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora is now upset with India and seems to have launched an anti-India campaign as it feels that India aided Sri Lanka in the war against LTTE. But by doing so, they are at loss as India is the only force that can give a meaningful solution in Sri Lanka. We, the political parties here in Tamil Nadu can only pressurize the Union government to act like in the case of UN human Rights Council resolution where India voted against Sri Lanka".
''In case of the political parties in Tamil Nadu, they take one stand when they are in opposition and take a different stand when they come to power. It is the same case whether it is AIADMK or DMK. If it is helping them to garner votes or gain some political mileage they take up the Eelam cause. If it is not advantageous they are ready to drop it," says Pamaran.
Except few political movements which have nothing to do with the vote bank politics, no one really cares for the Tamils in Sri Lanka, he added.
While everyone is busy milking the Lankan issue to their advantage, the real sufferers are the Tamils in the war affected Sri Lanka who are still struggling to make their ends meet. Now it is high time to bring in real peace, dignity to Lankan Tamils through political process.
Friday, July 13, 2012
Nothing but academic immorality - Kancha Ilaiah
Educational issues are best left with Parliament and not with ‘intellectual’ experts
Friday, July 6, 2012
பிராமி எழுத்தைக் கண்டுபிடித்தவர்கள் பிராமணர்கள்?
வணக்கம்
"Asoka embraced Buddhism no doubt. But nowhere does he mention that he
is spreading Buddha Dharma"
"Thus speaks the Beloved of the Gods, (Asoka): I have been a Buddhist
layman for more than two and a half years, but I did not make much
progress. Now for more than a year I have drawn closer to the Order
and have become more ardent. The gods, who in India up to this time
did not associate with men, now mingle with them, and this is the
result of my efforts. Moreover this is not something to be obtained
only by the great, but it is also open to the humble, if they are
earnest and they can even reach heaven easily. This is the reason for
this announcement that both humble and great should make progress and
that the neighboring peoples also should know that the progress is
lasting, And this investment will increase and increase abundantly,
and increase to half as much again. This matter must he inscribed here
and elsewhere on the hills, and wherever there is a stone pillar it is
to be engraved on that pillar. You must go out with this document
throughout the length and breadth of your district. This announcement
has been proclaimed while on tour; 256 nights have been spent on
tour."
இந்த மடல் குழுமத்தில் இருக்கும் தமிழ் அறிஞர்கள் இதுகுறித்துத் தமது கருத்துகளைப் பதிவு செய்தால் உதவியாக இருக்கும்.
Cartoon history
Kalpana Kannabiran on M.S.S.Pandian's note on NCERT text books
Here is a letter I wrote to the Editor, The Hindu, which was not carried. Also relevant is the fact that Pandian's note is an independent report and not part of the deliberations of the Review Committee. The official report very clearly states that Pandian did not attend the meetings and did not participate in the discussions. He was therefore only a nominal member of the committee. His note does not form part of the report of the review committee. His note in this context can scarcely be described as a "dissent", which must by definition arise from the deliberations and must form part of the report.
I think this is necessary for us to bear in mind.
Kalpana
Dear Editor
There are widely varying views on the use of cartoons in NCERT textbooks. MSS Pandian's dissent (4 July) is completely in line with one set of views that unequivocally defends the textbooks. The trouble with this view is that it dismisses criticism without applying the critical thinking that it advocates for children to its own endeavours. Pandian does not say anything new or different either in tenor or substance. Nor does his note on the face of it engage with the deliberations of the Thorat Committee. Be that as it may, what is surprising is the tenor of the editorial, which reiterates what Pandian has said, and casts all criticism of the textbooks in the language of honour and shame. Why is it a national shame if the government accepts the recommendations of the Thorat Committee and why is Pandian's dissent honourable? After due deliberation, the committee has arrived at a set of recommendations, which one can agree or disagree with. But surely The Hindu should make space for more representative stands on the issue.
Kalpana Kannabiran
Council for Social Development
Rajendranagar
Hyderabad 500030